<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZDNET Recomends Kicking IE to the Curb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fonz.net/blog/archives/2005/01/08/zdnet-recomends-kicking-ie-to-the-curb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fonz.net/blog/archives/2005/01/08/zdnet-recomends-kicking-ie-to-the-curb/</link>
	<description>Live fast, love hard, and dont let anyone else use your comb!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ilan</title>
		<link>http://www.fonz.net/blog/archives/2005/01/08/zdnet-recomends-kicking-ie-to-the-curb/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fonz.net/blog/archives/2005/01/08/zdnet-recomends-kicking-ie-to-the-curb/#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Tom,

You are right, some day it is possible that spyware may start to hit mozilla's suite of tools as it has IE, Outlook Express, etc.  However, when it does  I believe mozilla will be a much faster moving target than than a proprietary product like Internet Explorer. I think holes will be plugged much more quickly than they can ever be in IE or other MSFT products.  If I'm wrong then firefox will sink like IE and someone else will come about to compete at which point we'll all switch to them.  The great thing about commodity software like browsers and mail clients is that they are all standards based and I can swap one out for another at anytime without to much of a headache.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>You are right, some day it is possible that spyware may start to hit mozilla&#8217;s suite of tools as it has IE, Outlook Express, etc.  However, when it does  I believe mozilla will be a much faster moving target than than a proprietary product like Internet Explorer. I think holes will be plugged much more quickly than they can ever be in IE or other MSFT products.  If I&#8217;m wrong then firefox will sink like IE and someone else will come about to compete at which point we&#8217;ll all switch to them.  The great thing about commodity software like browsers and mail clients is that they are all standards based and I can swap one out for another at anytime without to much of a headache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Erickson</title>
		<link>http://www.fonz.net/blog/archives/2005/01/08/zdnet-recomends-kicking-ie-to-the-curb/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Erickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fonz.net/blog/archives/2005/01/08/zdnet-recomends-kicking-ie-to-the-curb/#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Regarding your move from IE to Firefox.  I agree to that going to an environ where all is well with the world and spyware can be blocked more effectively.  But isn't this just because the spyware enthusiats and various others who are predisposed to dislike all MS products are currently focusing on IE.  Who's to say Firefox might not be bext on the perverbial hit-list?

Is the problem with IE or with the spyware developers?   Should we not be directing efforts to towards finding a solution of this and the myriad other problems rather than pointing fingers and wasting tefforts and limited resources.?  

Admittedly. MS could and should do a MUCH better job at building 'ships' without holes than they do.  But they, in and of themselves,  are not the problem.  The spyware sharks are.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your move from IE to Firefox.  I agree to that going to an environ where all is well with the world and spyware can be blocked more effectively.  But isn&#8217;t this just because the spyware enthusiats and various others who are predisposed to dislike all MS products are currently focusing on IE.  Who&#8217;s to say Firefox might not be bext on the perverbial hit-list?</p>
<p>Is the problem with IE or with the spyware developers?   Should we not be directing efforts to towards finding a solution of this and the myriad other problems rather than pointing fingers and wasting tefforts and limited resources.?  </p>
<p>Admittedly. MS could and should do a MUCH better job at building &#8217;ships&#8217; without holes than they do.  But they, in and of themselves,  are not the problem.  The spyware sharks are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
